Times article here.
Predicted response from every administrator who has ever cut an arts program:
“well, standardized tests are the only truly objective way to measure student improvement.”
Monthly Archives: July 2006
Reading, Reading, Reading
WAPO story here.
Surprise, Surprise: Textbooks Stink
NYTimes piece here.
Quote from J.M.Rice (1893)
John Mayer Rice’s 1893 expose on public school systems caused quite a stir. Here are some of his comments about Philadelphia:
The public schools of Philadelphia offer a striking example of the difficulties involved in advancing schools, when those in authority use their offices for selfish motives, whether political or other, instead of for the purpose of furthering the welfare of the children entrusted to their care. And these schools show again the evils consequent upon a school system conducted without a responsible head, a circumstance which gives rise to constant conflict among the hundreds of irresponsible heads, who, in struggling against each other for the purpose of preserving their own rights, forget that none of them has any rights; for all rights belong to the children for whom the schools exist.
Documentary I’d like to use
“Chiefs”
link here.
This 2004 film documents the travails of a Native American basketball team. What was striking to me was the resemblance of these players to the African American students I taught at West Philadelphia High School.
A great history/methods text
Barton, Keith and Linda Levstik. Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NH.:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
Great stuff.
Several good quotes:
“a Democracy is more than a form of government; it is primarily a mode of associated living, of conjoint communicated experience.” John Dewey, D&E, p.87
Slowly converting to Word Press from Grey Matter
Friends: slowly making this transition; bear with me.
Review by Russell Baker
Baker, Russell. “Talking it Up.” New York Review of Books, May 11, 2006.
What I liked was his description of what makes a good conversation:
Both participants listen attentively to each other; neither tries to promote himself by pleasing the other; both are obviously enjoying an intellectual workout; neither spoils the evening’s peaceable air by making a speech or letting disagreement flare into anger; they do not make tedious attempts to be witty. They observe classic conversational etiquette with a self-discipline that would have pleased Michel de Montaigne, Samuel Johnson, or any of a dozen other old masters of good talk whom Miller cites as authorities.
This etiquette, Miller says, is essential if conversation is to rise to the level of—well, “good conversation.” The etiquette is hard on hotheads, egomaniacs, windbags, clowns, politicians, and zealots. The good conversationalist must never go purple with rage, like people on talk radio; never tell a long-winded story, like Joseph Conrad; and never boast that his views enjoy divine approval, like a former neighbor of mine whose car bumper declared, “God Said It, I Believe It, And That Settles It.”
I’d like to snip this and put it in the opening portion of my next few syllabi…
