When is accountability easy? When is accountability hard?

We had a terrific opening conversation this morning as kids started to consider ideas of accountability. We had started this earlier in the quarter but as with most things, you need to deal with it again and again.

KS led the discussion effectively.

I had two things that I wanted to get on their radar: one, how do social pressures affect ideas of accountability? In other words, how do we manage this one-on-one, in small groups, and as a large group? Two, how do we deal with situations when there’s no dissonance as a student talks about their work? In other words, when a student holds up a crap project and claims that it is amazing, how do we help puncture that illusion/delusion?

Some notes from their conversation:
It’s hard to hold people accountable when:
MH: ou don’t know them or the their work; when it doesn’t affect you.
AH: you’ve never done that work before
TC: they’re upset or angry
VG: people won’t reflect honestly; when it’s subtle (big is easier than small)
IP: they don’t accept responsibility

It’s easy to hold people accountable when:
DD: you have proof
VG: you share the same goals
MT: you focus on their goals
VG: you know their situation
KS: you’re aware of their (unique) situation.

Favorite line: We’re doing complex projects so it’s not always clear what good work is.

Matt Desmond talk

Monday night I got to hear Harvard sociologist and MacArthur Genius Matt Desmond present the 33rd Annual Urban Studies lecture.

Awesome.

Two questions I would have asked:

1. This research reveals a key source of the mobility that teachers in city schools have always felt. I’d always assumed that this was about poverty, crappy housing stock, and slumlords, but this book makes clear that the weight of the state stands behind the craplords and, as Desmond said so eloquently, “eviction is a cause, not a condition, of poverty.” I wondered what policies the school district as well as the massive network of charter schools in Milwaukee had adopted to deal with this situation or whether it was another thing teachers would have to deal with. Desmond notes the enormous cost kids pay when the “rent eats first” but I hope an ethnographer on his team is studying the overlap between the affordable housing crisis and challenges in urban education. (For example, I would guess that kids who have more stable housing situations are more likely to be involved in charter schools where managing the admission process requires a kind of stability; similarly, entering (and staying) at at a magnet school would be difficult amidst constant housing change.

When he announced that he was hiring lots of research assistants, I got that crazy project-based teacher feeling and wondered if we could design a project for our students in West Philadelphia to try and take on some piece of this. They could write and conduct their own mini-survey, graph their experiences, and do some interviewing about this issue. Especially if we could use Desmond’s notion that eviction is an issue of “inevitability not personal responsibility” as a way of making clear this is a big issue, not one to feel shame about.

2. I appreciated that Desmond spent so much time with Milwaukee’s landlords and tried to get their side of the story. I got to thinking about my block, where there are 46 structures but only 11 (or so) are owner occupied and only about half are still single family homes, even if they’re rented as group homes. The rest are apartment buildings.

Over the past twenty-two years I see the same story repeated again and again: folks in their late 20s or early 30s, having purchased their own home then use the equity to purchase a second or third rental building. These mini-real estate empire builders cross all racial and ethnic lines but they follow a similar pattern:

* they use craptastic contractors who do quick and dirty work or they do the work themselves,
* they do not pull permits for the work.
* they purchase the home and we see them regularly for the first year or so, then not so much.

There’s all sorts of tax incentives and financial incentives to keep apartments just nice enough to stay full and barely legal. There’s no incentive to contribute to the community of the block especially as it seems as though rent keeps going up.

If we just embrace housing vouchers, don’t we miss the other structures that allow landlords (and slumlords) to keep on keepin’ on? What other ideas might we pursue? I’ve always wanted a tax break for individuals who convert shitty apartments into single family homes, which would work for my block, but might also fuel gentrification.

Loose ends

After opening Monday with our usual discussion of the weekend, I turned to the question of all the loose ends we currently have in our class. With all of our different projects and all of our different afternoon commitments, it’s worth gathering as a large group to discuss what’s loose. What’s interesting is how fast this leads to a philosophical conversation about our model and the way we do things. For example, should a college level course that meets for a semester replace a course that’s offered all year in high school? Similarly, what time and space should we devote for discussing the way things work in the school and the opportunities students have?

It was funny — there was some poking the bear as kids sought to get a reaction out of me — but nearly all of the questions and concerns (and emotional outbursts) were legit.

I had two undergrads here and I had mixed emotions. I would argue that devoting this much time is necessary but it sure looks and feels kind of sloppy, kind of noisy, kind of all over the place. The big mistake I made was not having a student carefully taking notes so that we could refer to the conversation later.

Worthwhile contest

Covering Letter Contest.

Here’s the prompt:

PARTICIPANTS ARE INVITED TO SUBMIT AN ORIGINAL ESSAY THAT RESPONDS TO THE FOLLOWING CONTEST PROMPT:

In this era of social media, in which modes and methods of communication are more abundant than ever before, what can Gandhi’s letter tell us about how we interact with those who disagree with us? Is the written word now just a means to lob rhetorical grenades, or is there hope for seeking common ground with our opponents with language that appeals to our shared humanity?

Copies of the original document here.

This is one of those contests that every thoughtful adult should do; writing 500-1,000 words by January 13th ought to be in range.

Fall letter, Q1, 2016

This is the text of the letter I sent to students and their parents at the end of first quarter. It’s an attempt to offer broad feedback across the entire range of projects so I don’t have to write the same thing over and over. At the end, I add a page for comment specific to students.

November 4, 2016

Dear family and friends,

What a great first quarter! Students: I hope you’ve enjoyed your time in 101/201 as much as I have. Parents: I hope your students have relayed some of the exciting work we’ve done together as well as the work they’re planning on doing second quarter. This letter is both a summary of the work we’ve done as well as some general recommendations for all students about how they can improve their final products and their work processes.

Our first project — the What’s Out There project — asked students to identify a community organization that they might work with in the future or a group that has served their area of Philadelphia. The best of these written projects can be found on the website, as I’ve slowly started posting the ones edited enough to be public. I want this website to become a resource for other students and staff in the coming years.

Some of the lessons I hope that students took from this project: one, writing for project work is something that ought to occur with a public purpose in mind. In this case, you were trying to share your work with other students and community members. As such, having clean, clear prose that’s accessible is very important. Second, while you are writing, you want to constantly be thinking about the intention of your final piece. Much of school is taken up with writing for no real purpose (think book reports that no one EVER reads again). Similarly, your research should be guided this way: why am I reading this piece? How will it help me? Many of you still go to a website (usually the first google result) and assume that because it popped up, the information it contains is worthwhile to your project. The more you critically read things, the better your project. I hope that these lessons from the project continue throughout the year.

Our second project — the Pallet Project/How we work piece — was designed to get you working in small groups and doing some building. The best of these projects were pretty stunning, particularly the nightstand/charging piece and the fish tank/plant stand. For those of you whose projects were not finished or partially finished, I hope you can ask yourself what happened. And as you answer, I hope you think about what your own role is and move past simple ideas like “I need to be more focused” or “our group had problems”. I’d also ask you think about how the three components might relate to each other — the eventual piece, the design portfolio, and the instructable — and what you can learn from this process. Some groups had group issues that appear to be ongoing. The lessons there seem obvious to me: is it possible to split the work up and then not talk to each other again?

Our third project represents something all of you earned from doing the Gateway project: the opportunity to design your own project for second quarter. We’ve been battling to get this done — no thanks to SEPTA — and I hope that each of you are proud of your work. The major thing to think about when you are designing your own piece is to make sure that you have a project you love and care deeply about. The work on these projects is going to get difficult! For example, you might love thinking about how body language reflects human intentions, but are you really ready to read a psychology textbook, study how scholars have addressed this question, and then formulate your own experiment? Or are you going to shut down the moment that the text and the project gets difficult? As each of you have designed these pieces yourselves, I’ve wondered about those of you who appear to be stuck already. What are the strategies you use? Remember that conceiving your own project is very, very hard work and so is also incredibly rewarding. For these projects to truly grow wings, you need to own them through and through: there’s only one teacher, but there are twenty other students and a city of 1.5 million souls who can help you move the work along. Use as many of them as you can.

Finally, in all of our spare time, we’ve taken on a series of hands-on projects. From safety videos to kitchen caddies to a cabinet for a local gardening center, you’ve all done some cool things. I know that this project has been an in-between project, one that we’ve not been able to focus big blocks of time on, but I still appreciate the effort being made by all of you. I look forward to seeing how these finish!

We’ve also read and written about a terrific book, The Boy Who Harnessed The Wind. Your short essays on whether you would recommend this book and how we as a school can use this book are reasonably well-done. As always, when you write about a text, spend less time explicitly summarizing (this happened and then this happened and then he did it) and more time explaining why the book matters. All of these essays, when ready, will be published on-line. For second quarter, we will have a book we will read, the curious incident of the dog in the night time, which is the Free Library’s One Book text. You will also have an individual book that you’ve selected, either with my help (what a terrific afternoon we had in the used bookstore) or on your own.

Remember that the point of book group is to do two things: one, build up stamina for reading; to succeed in college you will have to be able to read for extended periods of time without distraction. I hope that the various reading strategies we’ve talked about have helped with this, but try and carve 30, 60, 90 minutes a day when you are reading quietly, with no phone, and as few distractions as you can manage.

During the afternoons, all of you have attended CCP and Penn. Some of you have attended Drexel too! So far, we’ve been working as a large cohort but we will soon split to individual courses. Several thoughts: I want to applaud the majority of you who have understood and worked hard when presented with a lecture format, where the teacher or guest lecturer does most of the talking. This is a hard skill to develop but a critical one. You’re lucky — you attend a school where little of the time is taken up with a teacher upfront doing pretty much all of the talking. Much of college works differently and it’s important to realize that developing active listening skills will serve you very well. Second, remember that you are lucky to have a teacher, a principal, a counselor, and all sorts of adults who are constantly asking you how you are doing. All that will remain of us when you get to college is the echoes of our (annoying) voices and it will be up to you to figure out what to do. The more practice you get at maximizing these opportunities and tracking your own work, the better off you will be.

Several concluding ideas for you to think about. One, I hope all of you stay proud of the work you’ve done to create our advisory community. Every visitor who comes through remarks upon it. My favorite moment was when Daniel and Angeline were leading a tour and our group explained in such vivid detail what our school was about. To a serious muckety-muck from 440 who was absolutely blown away.

Two, I hope all of you think about how the work we’re doing this year connects to your future. This sort of project work helps you figure out how to keep yourself moving forward, even when it gets hard. More to the point, it helps you realize that life isn’t a series of on-off switches that you can throw when you feel like it. Consistent hard work ALWAYS pays off.

Three, I want all of you to think about the ways in which you seize control over your own work. What are the things you do to ensure that progress is being made? Some of this has to occur in school. It’s actually something I worry about: should I give less work time in school and spend more time creating activities that you can bring towards your own work? In other words, should I decrease the amount of time spent in whole group activities so that you can get work individually? What will be gained and what will be lost?

On a personal note, this quarter has been one of my favorite quarters in a long, long time. You are a fun yet serious group, a cohort committed to each other, and just fun to be around. Keep up the good work!

Affectionately and respectfully yours,

Clapper

SEPTA and community

I don’t begrudge my union brothers and sisters the right to strike. I envy them the leverage of the election and that the legislature did not strip them of the right to strike. While SEPTA drivers have bumped my bike three times, cursed at me in front of my children for having the temerity to ride in a bike lane, and cursed at me for asking that an elderly woman be allowed onto the 52 in subzero weather, they still deserve more than their current contract. (If you live in Philly, you have at least a dozen stories of crappy SEPTA drivers, and at least one or two of a driver doing something unbelievably generous and kind).

What’s happened to my class this week, though, is distressing. We spent so much time building community. Community is based on presence. With 22 individuals, we have our highs and lows, our recurring patterns (“no, I don’t know what you’re saying”, “why do you all have to care so much?”) and a rhythm that moves us through the days and weeks. I wish I’d taken a group dynamics course so I had a cleaner sense of how this works and potential strategies to address what happens when multiple individuals come out of the group. I’ve felt it at every level of education, as a student and a teacher, where a change in the group undermines everybody’s commitment to move forward. It almost feels like a new group each day, where we have to restart and re-make the culture, which is tough because that’s hard work anyway and doing it from scratch feels like a let down.

As a professional, I can keep moving the group forward, but it’s hard.