Quote from Julian Barnes

Quote from the weekend:

Was there a greater portrayal of the shattering of human illusions than King Lear? No, that was not quite right: not shattering, because that implied a single great crisis. Rather, what happened to human illusions was that they crumbled, they withered away. It was a long wearisome process, like a toothache reaching far into the soul. But you can pull out a tooth and it will be gone. Illusions, however, even when dead, continue to rot and stink within us. We cannot escape their taste and smell. We carry them around with us all the time. He did.
(p.93)

Is a dream a lie if it don’t come true, or is it something worse?

Barnes, Julian. The Noise of Time. New York: Albert A. Knopf, 2016.

Patriotism

I watched the inaugural speech with my students. I’m hoping that Garry Wills will have a close analysis of the text as there were numerous moments that a serious scholar will be able to explain better than I will, i.e., Donald Trump using the verb “join” — “We, the citizens of America, are now joined in a great national effort to rebuild our country and restore its promise for all of our people ” — mirrors the opening lines of Martin Luther King’s I have a dream speech, which leaves me vaguely nauseated.

King’s words, “I am happy to join with you today in what will go down in history as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation”, are worth reading again, then, particularly as a counterpoint to Mr. Trump.

I’m more interested, though, in this part of the speech:

“When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.”

First of all, this makes more sense if you invert it, i.e., When you open your heart to prejudice, there is no room for patriotism. If (and I’m dubious) his point was that a true patriot cannot be prejudiced, then my version makes more sense, simply because I’m not sure how one opens one’s heart to patriotism. I can open my heart to another. I feel like I grew up listening to Catholic masses where I was asked to open my heart. Madonna sang about opening her heart too. Don’t click on this at work.

Patriot, though, looking at the OED, shows three threads:

One: Someone who loves their country. This is the definition I’m most familiar with and it’s the one that you’ll hear claimed as a way of excluding others. I’m a patriot (so you must not be). Within this definition, though, at the OED, they note that “Good Patriot” only began after 1680, that before that you were either a patriot or not.

Two: There’s a second ironic strand, too. Apparently Patriot took on a derogatory meaning in the early part of the 18th century. Here’s the full definition, which rang true today:

“A person who claims to be disinterestedly or self-sacrificingly devoted to his or her country, but whose actions or intentions are considered to be detrimental or hypocritical.”

Three: A freedom fighter — if you believe you are in an occupied country, then you can claim an identity as a patriot.

I would like to see the trajectory of this term. I’m sure someone has done it already.

Civility and citizenship

One
For better or worse, the baseline for my classroom is presence and civility. It’s the starting point and the non-negotiable. I’m always looking for stuff about this.

Sunday’s paper, back page of the book review, on civility. It’s three academic works but Ryerson’s reflections are sound.

Two
In PD yesterday, some genius principal presented us with Barack Obama’s concluding speech and asked us to think about how we might use it in the classroom. In my small group, we came up with the idea of shifting some of the words to reflect what we want for our advisory.

President Obama’s words:

It falls to each of us to be those those anxious, jealous guardians of our democracy; to embrace the joyous task we’ve been given to continually try to improve this great nation of ours. Because for all our outward differences, we, in fact, all share the same proud title, the most important office in a democracy: Citizen. Citizen.

So, you see, that’s what our democracy demands. It needs you. Not just when there’s an election, not just when your own narrow interest is at stake, but over the full span of a lifetime. If you’re tired of arguing with strangers on the Internet, try talking with one of them in real life. If something needs fixing, then lace up your shoes and do some organizing. If you’re disappointed by your elected officials, grab a clipboard, get some signatures, and run for office yourself. Show up. Dive in. Stay at it.

“… you see, that’s what our democracy demands. It needs you.”
Sometimes you’ll win. Sometimes you’ll lose. Presuming a reservoir of goodness in other people, that can be a risk, and there will be times when the process will disappoint you. But for those of us fortunate enough to have been a part of this work, and to see it up close, let me tell you, it can energize and inspire. And more often than not, your faith in America — and in Americans — will be confirmed. (Applause.)

What if we replace democracy with the Workshop School? What if we replace democracy with advisory? How is it the same? How is it different?

Trying to get across the finish line

In the end of the quarter trap as we try and finish strong. I have to provide enough structure so that things don’t fall apart but not so much that I’m adding even more pressure. If at this point they don’t know the impact of not completing, there’s very little I can do.

So we began by making self portraits that featured the cheesiest motivation slogan they could come up with and three ways they can help others.

Examples below:
Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

Work Resolutions: Personal and Group

Our late circle today was to think about two sets of resolutions: two or three for yourself in terms of the work and two or three for the larger group with the caveat that it has to be something you think we can all agree to. Now they are humans so at least a third decided to write their own resolutions around personal stuff.

We didn’t share the personal ones but we did spend fifteen minutes as a group coming to consensus on what might work for the whole group: committing to one microphone. We’ll come back to this idea tomorrow and try and figure out what it means. One thing I did have to get involved with was when a student claimed that this was a problem all students have; I had to underscore that this is not an everyone problem, that almost all of them manage “one mic” very well.

It led to a human group problem: if everyone offers a side comment once every five minutes then you’ll have side conversations going pretty much continuously.

My two work resolutions:
1. Grade thirty minutes each night.
2. Meet with each student one-on-one once a week. I started this yesterday.

Balance and Letting Go

One of the things we’ve committed to this year is teachers presenting portfolios of their work over the course of the year. I’ll be honest, I didn’t look forward to this and thought that it would be one more task on an already too long list of things to do.

I was wrong. This presentations have been powerful and I’ve left each of them with new questions for myself.

Yesterday Captain America presented. His impressive and thoughtful presentation left me with the following thought: there’s a difference between learning to let go and achieving balance in your teaching practice.

Letting go is looking at the forty thousand things you might do as a teacher and knowing that you can’t do them all; what I’ve not quite learned is how to let go of these things. I still feel guilty, looking at various things that should have gotten done that simply have not gotten done and that given that there are only 168 hours in a week, will never get done.

Balance, then, is what happens when you figure out what you can do after you’ve let go of things. New teachers who haven’t figured out what to let go of, who are just trying not to drown.

I hope teachers realize that you can’t achieve balance until you know what you’re trying to balance. I also hope they realize that these are two separate skills for teachers to develop and maintain as they continue to teach.

Improvisation

Prompts
Improvisation
Create and make spontaneously; made do with what you have; going all MacGyver on it. (Note: none of them know who MacGyver is)

When is improvisation a good thing, a healthy thing, a worthwhile thing? Try and come up with at least three scenarios and explain why it helps? (Example: when there’s six seconds left on the shot clock, you don’t run a new play)

  • When you do not have everything you need
  • When you run out of materials or you need a specific tool
  • BC: Improvising is good when you’ve done the work.
  • When is improvisation unproductive? When might it become a crutch or even an excuse?

    MB: It can be not productive when you’re not getting anywhere or you’re not accomplishing anything. It might become an excuse because you think you’re doing something but you’re actually not.
    EG: When you do it for no reason.
    KM: When you are the president of the United States of America.
    MH: When it’s the main or first way of going about things; it should come naturally out of fluid, good work.
    HG: When you’re using it not to complete the work.
    SH: One unproductive way is doing at the last minute and putting almost anything in it to get it done.

    We ended the conversation by talking about why I would bring this up in terms of the CSpan video.

    Example:
    Untitled